Volume 14, Issue 1 p. 26-43
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Free to Read

The role of goal adjustment during rehabilitation from stroke

Yongwon Cho

Corresponding Author

Yongwon Cho

Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

Correspondence

Yongwon Cho, Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, 3223 Social and Behavioral Science Gateway, 234 Pereira Dr, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jeremy M. Hamm

Jeremy M. Hamm

Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jutta Heckhausen

Jutta Heckhausen

Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Steven C. Cramer

Steven C. Cramer

Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

California Rehabilitation Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 June 2021
Citations: 2

Abstract

We investigated motivational regulation involving adjustment of recovery goals in post-stroke rehabilitation via standard in-clinic physiotherapy and in-home telerehabilitation (TR). We used a secondary dataset collected at 11 US sites as part of a clinical trial using video games and game control pads designed to induce certain arm movements required for recovery (n = 124; Mage = 61.44, SD = 13.30). Participants were randomly assigned to either the TR or in-clinic condition and underwent 36 therapy sessions, reporting on their activity-inherent enjoyment for 6–8 weeks. Compared with the in-clinic patients and TR patients with high game performance, TR patients with lower game performance reported lower activity-inherent enjoyment, which is an important motivational resource for successful recovery. The results suggest that these differences occur because TR patients become discouraged by low game score feedback, which may have signaled a poor prospect for recovery. However, the results also suggest that low game performers who successfully adjusted their recovery goals were resilient to the impact of low game score feedback on their motivational resources and satisfaction with therapy. The findings suggest that goal adjustment may be particularly beneficial when patients are discouraged by feedback indicating suboptimal recovery prospects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data that support the findings of this study are available for sharing upon request at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Clinical Research Liaison (https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Current-Research/Research-Funded-NINDS/Clinical-Research/Archived-Clinical-Research-Datasets) by archive identifier NCT02360488 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02360488?term=telerehabilitation&recrs=e).