Volume 69, Issue 4 p. 1470-1505
Special Issue

Challenges and Resilience: Managers’ Perceptions of Firm Performance Following M&As

Richard Croucher

Richard Croucher

Middlesex University Business School, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Keith W. Glaister

Corresponding Author

Keith W. Glaister

University of Leeds, UK

Address for correspondence: Keith W. Glaister, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Marian Rizov

Marian Rizov

University of Lincoln, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Yasin RofcaninGeoffrey Wood

Geoffrey Wood

University of Essex, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 October 2019
Citations: 3

Abstract

We study mergers and acquisitions (M&As), resilience and performance, identifying links between managers’ perceptions of performance and resilience, using trans-national organisational-level survey evidence (N = 3,613) and follow up semi-structured in-depth interviews with managers involved in M&As and demerger. Drawing on the resilience and M&A literature, we identify reasons why employees in acquired firms may be less resilient in coping with the resultant changes than those of the acquirer and why this will negatively impact perceptions of performance. We explore the causes and consequences of variations in resilience and performance within firms that acquire others, and in those that have been demerged. As anticipated, we find that although managers in acquired firms tended to report worse performance than those in acquiring firms, both tended to be more positive than firms that had not taken part in an M&A at all. We draw out implications for theory and practice.