Invisible Support: Effects on the Provider's Positive and Negative Affect
Corresponding Author
Urte Scholz
University of Zurich, Switzerland
Address for correspondence: Urte Scholz, University of Zürich, Department of Psychology, Applied Social and Health Psychology, Binzmühlestrasse 14 / Box 14, 8050 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Urte Scholz
University of Zurich, Switzerland
Address for correspondence: Urte Scholz, University of Zürich, Department of Psychology, Applied Social and Health Psychology, Binzmühlestrasse 14 / Box 14, 8050 Zürich, Switzerland. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background
Social support that goes unnoticed by receivers (i.e. invisible support) seems to be most beneficial for the receivers' well-being. The providers' well-being, however, has been neglected so far. This study examines how invisible support is related to the providers' well-being and whether this association is dependent on the providers' relationship satisfaction.
Methods
Overall, 97 non-smoking partners of smokers who were about to quit smoking were examined. Invisible support was assessed dyadically: partners' reports on smoking-specific provided social support together with smokers' reports on received support were assessed at baseline. Partners' relationship satisfaction was also assessed at baseline. Partners' positive and negative affect were measured at baseline and six-week follow-up.
Results
No main effects of invisible instrumental or emotional support occurred. However, partners' relationship satisfaction moderated the association between invisible instrumental support and change in partners' negative and positive affect: For partners with lower relationship satisfaction more invisible instrumental support was related to increased negative affect and decreased positive affect, whereas for partners with higher relationship satisfaction the inverse effects occurred.
Conclusions
The study's results emphasise that invisible instrumental support might have emotional costs for the providers. Relationship satisfaction seems to serve as a protective factor.
References
- Antonucci, T.C., & Jackson, J.S. (1990). The role of reciprocity in social support. In B.R. Sarason, I.G. Sarason, & G.R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 111–128). New York: J. Wiley & Sons.
- Bennett, L., Ross, M.W., & Sunderland, R. (1996). The relationship between recognition, rewards and burnout in AIDS caring. AIDS Care, 8 (2), 145–154. doi:10.1080/09540129650125830
- Biehle, S.N., & Mickelson, K.D. (2012). Provision and receipt of emotional spousal support: The impact of visibility on well-being. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 1 (3), 244–251.
10.1037/a0028480 Google Scholar
- Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T.A. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/11031-002 Google Scholar
- Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., & Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20 (3), 485–493. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485
- Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (3), 458–475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.458
- Bolger, N., Foster, M., Vinokur, A.D., & Ng, R. (1996). Close relationships and adjustments to a life crisis: The case of breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (2), 283–294. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.283
- Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R.C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 953–961. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
- Braun, M., Scholz, U., Bailey, B., Perren, S., Hornung, R., & Martin, M. (2009). Dementia caregiving in spousal relationships: A dyadic perspective. Aging & Mental Health, 13 (3), 426–436. doi:10.1080/13607860902879441
- Brown, S.L., Brown, R.M., House, J.S., & Smith, D.M. (2008). Coping with spousal loss: Potential buffering effects of self-reported helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34 (6), 849–861. doi:10.1177/0146167208314972
- Brown, S.L., Nesse, R.M., Vinokur, A.D., & Smith, D.M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14 (4), 320–327. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14461
- Burkert, S., Knoll, N., & Scholz, U. (2005). Korrelate der Rauchgewohnheiten von Studierenden und jungen Akademikern: Das Konzept der dyadischen Planung [Correlates of smoking habits among university students and young academics: The concept of dyadic planning]. Psychomed, 17, 240–246.
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences ( 3rd edn.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Coyne, J.C., & Smith, D.A. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives' distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 404–412. Retrieved from 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.404
- Cutrona, C.E. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Sage series on close relationships: Vol. 13. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10.4135/9781483327563 Google Scholar
- Dinkel, A., & Balck, F. (2006). Psychometrische Analyse der deutschen Dyadic Adjustment Scale [Psychometric analysis of the German Dyadic Adjustment Scale]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 214 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1026/0044-3409.214.1.1
- Gleason, M.E., Iida, M., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P.E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (8), 1036–1045. doi:10.1177/0146167203253473
- Gottman, J.M., & Notarius, C.I. (2002). Marital research in the 20th century and a research agenda for the 21st century. Family Process, 41 (2), 159–197. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41203.x.
- Graham, J.W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60 (1), 549–576. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530
- Grant, A.M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (6), 946–955. doi:10.1037/a0017935
- Haber, M.G., Cohen, J.L., Lucas, T., & Baltes, B.B. (2007). The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39 (1–2), 133–144. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9100-9
- Hatfield, E., Walster, G.W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Johnson, M.D., & Bradbury, T.N. (1999). Marital satisfaction and topographical assessment of marital interaction: A longitudinal analysis of newlywed couples. Personal Relationships, 6 (1), 19–40. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00209.x.
- Kalman, D. (2002). The subjective effects of nicotine: Methodological issues, a review of experimental studies, and recommendations for future research. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 4 (1), 25–70. doi:10.1080/14622200110098437
- Knoll, N., Burkert, S., Kramer, J., Roigas, J., & Gralla, O. (2009). Relationship satisfaction and erectile functions in men receiving laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Effects of provision and receipt of spousal social support. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6 (5), 1438–1450. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01244.x.
- Knoll, N., Kienle, R., Bauer, K., Pfüller, B., & Luszczynska, A. (2007). Affect and enacted support in couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization: When providing is better than receiving. Social Science & Medicine, 64 (9), 1789–1801. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.004
- Knoll, N., Schulz, U., Schwarzer, R., & Rosemeier, H.P. (2006). Support provider's appraisal detection bias and the efficacy of received support in medical students preparing for an exam. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45 (3), 599–615. doi:10.1348/014466605X59978
- Kuijer, R.G., Buunk, B.P., & Ybema, J.F. (2001). Justice of give-and-take in the intimate relationship: When one partner of a couple is diagnosed with cancer. Personal Relationships, 8 (1), 75–92. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00029.x.
- Liang, J., Krause, N.M., & Bennett, J.M. (2001). Social exchange and well-being: Is giving better than receiving? Psychology and Aging, 16 (3), 511–523. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.511
- Lippert, T., & Prager, K.J. (2001). Daily experiences of intimacy: A study of couples. Personal Relationships, 8 (3), 283–298. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00041.x.
- Lu, L., & Argyle, M. (1992). Receiving and giving support: Effects on relationships and well-being. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 5 (2), 123–133. doi:10.1080/09515079208254456
10.1080/09515079208254456 Google Scholar
- Lüscher, J., Ochsner, S., Knoll, N., Stadler, G., Hornung, R., & Scholz, U. (2014). Examining gender differences in received, provided and invisible social control: An application of the dual-effects model. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 27, 678–694. doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.892585
- McBride, C.M., Curry, S.J., Grothaus, L.C., Nelson, J.C., Lando, H., & Pirie, P.L. (1998). Partner smoking status and pregnant smoker's perceptions of support for and likelihood of smoking cessation. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 17 (1), 63–69.
- Mcmahon, S.D., & Jason, L.A. (2000). Social support in a worksite smoking intervention: A test of theoretical models. Behavior Modification, 24 (2), 184–201. doi:10.1177/0145445500242002
- Maisel, N.C., & Gable, S.L. (2009). The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20 (8), 928–932. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x.
- Maslach, C. (2003). Burnout: The cost of caring. Cambridge, MA: Malor Books.
- Ochsner, S., Luszczynska, A., Stadler, G., Knoll, N., Hornung, R., & Scholz, U. (2014). The interplay of received social support and self-regulatory factors in smoking cessation. Psychology & Health, 29, 16–31. doi:10.1080/08870446.2013.818674
- Preacher, K.J., Curran, P.J., & Bauer, D.J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31 (4), 437–448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
- Reissman, C., Aron, A., & Bergen, M.R. (1993). Shared activities and marital satisfaction: Causal direction and self-expansion versus boredom. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10 (2), 243–254. doi:10.1177/026540759301000205
- Schulz, R., & Beach, S.R. (1999). Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: The caregiver health effects study. JAMA. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282 (23), 2215–2219. doi:10.1001/jama.282.23.2215
- Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology, 42 (4), 243–252. doi:10.1080/00207590701396641
- Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38 (1), 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547
- Sprecher, S. (2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3), 599–613. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=sih&AN=4976904&site=ehost-live
- Taylor, S.E. (2011). Social support: A review. In H.S. Friedman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342819.013.0009 Google Scholar
- Tucker, J.S. (2002). Health-related social control within older adults' relationships. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57 (5), 387–395. doi:10.1093/geronb/57.5.P387
10.1093/geronb/57.5.P387 Google Scholar
- US Department of Health & Human Services (2014). Help for smokers and other tobacco users: Quit smoking. Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guidelines-recommendations/tobacco/clinicians/tearsheets/helpsmokers.html
- Utne, M.K., Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., & Greenberger, D. (1984). Equity, marital satisfaction, and stability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1 (3), 323–332. doi:10.1177/0265407584013005
10.1177/0265407584013005 Google Scholar
- Warner, L.M., Schüz, B., Aiken, L., Ziegelmann, J.P., Wurm, S., Tesch-Römer, C., et al. (2013). Interactive effects of social support and social conflict on medication adherence in multimorbid older adults. Social Science & Medicine, 87, 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.012
- Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063–1070. Retrieved from 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063